
I suppose every interpretation has within
it something of truth. After all, we are beginning with God’s Word, the source
of all truth. But I fear this is far too tame an interpretation for any parable
of Jesus, let alone one that comes so near the end of his life. The parables of
Jesus were simple stories with great meaning. The series of parables that end
Matthew’s Gospel are stories with life and death meaning. These are stories that
have a way of getting to us. And if it is God who is doing the “getting,” our
discomfort is likely a clue to what we are meant to “get.”
So if you are curious, here is what
made us uncomfortable:
·
We
thought the one talent servant was short-changed. He started off with low
expectations. No wonder he was afraid.
·
Anyone
who is entrusted with someone else’s wealth and acts recklessly with it is
subject to a penalty. You should not act recklessly with what belongs to
another.
·
Just
how did those servants double their money? Did they do it honestly or
dishonestly? Could the parable become a license for those who abuse the
innocent and trusting gifts of others?
·
What
if the return on the investment had been less? What if the servants only earned
50% or 25% or even 10%? What would the master say then? What would the master
say if the servants risked the money and lost?
·
What’s
wrong with keeping something entrusted to you safe? Why was the third servant
judged so harshly? Is this really God? What happened to “salvation by grace
alone through faith alone”? We don’t like this image of God.
So
- just who is this master and what is his treasure? And what are we called to
do with it? We’ll pick up with those questions on Sunday.
No comments:
Post a Comment